tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-82530610904473746152024-02-07T13:01:25.649-08:00Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners"You should not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it would do and the harm it would cause if improperly administered." LBJHunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-86176225892801291752013-11-13T16:17:00.001-08:002013-11-13T16:23:20.557-08:00BOB PAUCEK: American Field 2013 Legend of the Game<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwiWDBa_TAFDwSzDXSvXNOomb-BxB3BFbrWCeZ6VcGYYUmgj60QDSF7rlyS4GJblTkoTKejc9T8uOuwj2_VtxAsnFn6dcLAVIU9DObwgAGgX77mhjGOME-GpOIXIsXlF_Fepa_IF0-N2HE/s1600/BLOG+BOB+PAUCEK-002.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwiWDBa_TAFDwSzDXSvXNOomb-BxB3BFbrWCeZ6VcGYYUmgj60QDSF7rlyS4GJblTkoTKejc9T8uOuwj2_VtxAsnFn6dcLAVIU9DObwgAGgX77mhjGOME-GpOIXIsXlF_Fepa_IF0-N2HE/s400/BLOG+BOB+PAUCEK-002.JPG" width="292" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">American Field 2013 Legend of the Game<br />
BOB PAUCEK (L)<br />
Presented by Ryan Frame (R)<br />
at the 2013 Grand National Steak Fry Dinner</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<strong>Berlin, NH </strong>Last week the American Field Grand National Grouse Championship (field trial) took place over in New Hampshire. The location for this championship rotates around the country and this year it returned to New England. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
John and I were invited to the annual "Grand National Steak Fry" dinner which was sponsored by Purina. We went because a very dear friend, Bob Paucek, was to be honored there. The White Mountain Chalet was the location of the formal dinner where indeed, mouth watering steaks were the top far served along with a myriad of well prepared food items, including cheese cake for dessert! </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXuXM3-QzGw_GdLdsyRsTRsvZjKpahzeWNnuCF7U1derLhx3ooc0-z8TIvZo0y460rHCYfIlAS0fjIsmP-thyphenhyphen5iFko0atQJExJdEYLHTrd6lRoZHtzkizT1Nhh5jKY2JDhmLnZVGyNKoL6/s1600/BLOG+BOB+PAUCEK.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="205" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXuXM3-QzGw_GdLdsyRsTRsvZjKpahzeWNnuCF7U1derLhx3ooc0-z8TIvZo0y460rHCYfIlAS0fjIsmP-thyphenhyphen5iFko0atQJExJdEYLHTrd6lRoZHtzkizT1Nhh5jKY2JDhmLnZVGyNKoL6/s320/BLOG+BOB+PAUCEK.JPG" width="320" /></a>We met up with friends Kelly Short, Bruce & Penny Burnell, and of course Bob & Pat Paucek. I think Bob was surprised to see us there because he had absolutely no idea of the honor which was to be bestowed upon him. Everyone had worked hard to keep it a secret. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Several announcements, awards, and recognition were given to various handlers and their dogs. Being a Brittany person involved mostly with AKC events I didn't know very many people there personally. I did say hello to Craig Doherty from Pointing Dog Journal. John is Vice President of the Maine Bird Dog Club and knew many who were there including John Stolgitis, Ryan Frame, Joe Dahl, and Lloyd Murray.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
When it was time for the "2013 Legend of the Game" award to be given the eyes of everyone sitting at our table were all on Bob, watching his reaction closely. Ryan Frame began the presentation by saying:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7BPY26HhINvZMxn4dpJN2rvREvHIa6IQqTU-s0KX-bKgzPYtd7MaMXQ8mBFqfQnm9wQdTagxxbDLlbZHvj3_W7c2ODqh7K8lT9CFhuM_A5o4l5Zd454XOmrskKzHLcRd1IP4r4cKD_s_J/s1600/BLOG+BOB+PAUCEK-001.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7BPY26HhINvZMxn4dpJN2rvREvHIa6IQqTU-s0KX-bKgzPYtd7MaMXQ8mBFqfQnm9wQdTagxxbDLlbZHvj3_W7c2ODqh7K8lT9CFhuM_A5o4l5Zd454XOmrskKzHLcRd1IP4r4cKD_s_J/s320/BLOG+BOB+PAUCEK-001.JPG" width="246" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
"<em>Born October 18, 1927 into a dog trainers family, he started training in 1955 at age 16 for Arthur Stackpool in Massachusetts. Until his dad passed on he was a cook at Westbrook College, also helping his father train dogs. Afterwards he began training dogs full time and purchased land and build a new kennel for boarding and training. About the early 70's he became involved with the Maine Bird Dog Club. Bob went on the Board of Directors in 1974 and has been a director ever since. He chaired the first spring trial in Scarborough, Maine, later found and laid out wild bird dog grounds at Calais where the first trial was October 4&5 1974. He discovered Brownfield Management Area while riding his motorcycle to Fryeburg Airport. He helped develop these grounds for the first field trial there. He chaired many trials between Scarborough and Brownfield until Brownfield became the official grounds for the Maine Bird Dog Club. In 1977 he brought the idea of wild bird grounds closer to Brownfield. With the help of Biologist Boizenhardt and Bob Sanderson they laid out 3 wild bird courses on what we (MBDC) call "The Island" where the first wild bird trial was held in 1982. That led in 1987 to the Northern New England Woodcock Championship in 1987 that is dedicated to him today."</em></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<em>Not being a big trailer himself, Bob strongly promotes and supports the sport and the sport of hunting. In the 70's he started going south to train in the winters, with his own place now in Barnwell, SC. He has trained all breeds of bird dogs, judged AKC hunt tests and many field trials and was always ready with his Kubota, donating his time to make ready "the course for the love of the sport and is still doing it today. Named as a legend in 2013".</em></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
As Ryan finished reading the plaques inscription Bob went forward and accepted his award. We all stood and applauded this humble yet deserving man as he was recognized as the "American Field 2013 Legend of the Game". </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
A copy of Bobs 2013 Legend of the Game plaque will be displayed with the Grouse Trial memorabilia at the Bird Dog Museum and Field Trial Hall of Fame in Grand Junction, Tennessee. There is a section in the Hall of Fame devoted exclusively to the "Legends of The Game." Congratulations Bob, you deserve this honor!</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
John and Ann Short</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Maine Hunting and Sporting Dog Owners<br />
J&A's Brittanys<br />
Acton, Maine</div>
Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-81659694116011404452013-04-15T09:55:00.000-07:002013-04-15T09:55:01.453-07:00ANTI-BREEDING Propaganda Surrounds Maine LD 1239<div>
Several years ago animal welfare legislation was heavily influenced and changed by animal rights group working hard in Maine. Many of those changes only served to complicate current laws, while putting added restrictions on all breeders and/or owners of multiple dogs. LD 1239 is an opportunity to make positive changes, on behalf of all responsible dog owners and ethical breeders in the state of Maine. <strong><u>SUPPORT</u></strong> this bill and PLEASE do what you can to encourage others to do so.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
The hearing is tomorrow for LD 1239 "An Act To Clarify, Streamline, and
Promote Fair Animal Welfare Laws"</div>
<br />
<div>
Text of bill is found: <a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?LD=1239&snum=126">http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?LD=1239&snum=126</a></div>
<br />
<div>
Tuesday, April 16th</div>
10:00 A.M.<br />
Room 214 - Cross Building at the State House<br />
<br />
<div>
As the anti breeding propaganda is being spun today here are a few things
that this bill is NOT about: </div>
<br />
<ul>
<li>It is NOT anti-animal welfare legislation</li>
<li>It will NOT make Maine a prime location for 'puppy mills' [sic] to set up
operations</li>
<li>It was NOT submitted by a dog breeder</li>
<li>It is NOT long and convoluted, but the changes are simple and serve to
provide CLARITY to the current laws </li>
<li>It will NOT prevent routine inspections of licensed breeding kennels</li>
<li>It will NOT cripple the abilities of humane agents, ACO's etc. to legally
investigate abuse, neglect, cruelty complaints</li>
<li>It will NOT allow unlicensed, uninspected, kennels and/or breeders to sell
as many puppies as they wish</li>
<li>It will NOT prevent national, regional organizations from assisting in
disaster situations or to raise funds</li>
</ul>
Your presence is encouraged and welcome at the hearing tomorrow.
Testimony in support of this bill would be appreciated. If you can't give it personally, forward a written copy to the clerk (below). <br />
<br />
<div>
Personall contacting the Committee on Agriculture, Conservation, Forestry asking them
to vote in SUPPORT of this bill is encouraged. Call them or email them today!!!</div>
<br />
<div>
Tell them you are in favor of making Maines current animal welfare
laws easier to understand for responsible dog owners, especially those who own
multiple dogs.</div>
<br />
<div>
Your message can be forwarded to the clerk who will share with the entire
committee: <a href="mailto:natasha.irving@legislature.maine.gov">natasha.irving@legislature.maine.gov</a></div>
Are any of the following your representatives? If so, contact them
personally.
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/senate/bio35s.htm">Senator Troy Dale
Jackson (D-Aroostook), Chair</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/senate/bio06s.htm">Senator James A. Boyle
(D-Cumberland)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/senate/bio34s.htm">Senator Roger L.
Sherman (R-Aroostook)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/dilljf.htm">Representative
James F. Dill (D-Old Town), Chair</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/kentps.htm">Representative
Peter S. Kent (D-Woolwich)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/hickcv.htm">Representative
Craig V. Hickman (D-Winthrop)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/jonebl.htm">Representative
Brian L. Jones (D-Freedom)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/noonwf.htm">Representative
William F. Noon (D-Sanford)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/saucrj.htm">Representative
Robert J. Saucier (D-Presque Isle)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/crayda.htm">Representative
Dean A. Cray (R-Palmyra)*</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/maredg.htm">Representative
Donald G. Marean (R-Hollis)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/blacrj.htm">Representative
Russell J. Black (R-Wilton)</a>
<a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/hsebios/timbjl.htm">Representative
Jeffrey L. Timberlake (R-Turner)</a><br />
<br />
<div>
Commitee Link: <a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/jt_com/acf.htm">http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/jt_com/acf.htm</a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div>
Sincerely,</div>
John and Ann Short<br />
Maine Hunting and Sporting Dog OwnersHunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-66060021590273626692013-03-04T17:33:00.003-08:002013-03-04T17:33:19.337-08:002013 AKC Pointing Breed Hunt Tests - MAINE<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong><u>Saturday April 27 & Sunday April 28 2013</u></strong></div>
<br />
<div>
AKC Pointing Breed Hunting Tests (Junior, Senior, Hunter)</div>
<br />
<div>
Kennebunk Plains (Wildlife Management Area), Kennebunk Maine</div>
<br />
<div>
Hosted by: Central Maine Brittany Club</div>
<br />
<div>
PREMIUM LINK: <a href="mhtml:{EA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C}mid://00001078/!x-usc:http://clubs.akc.org/brit/ClubPremiums/CentralMaineHT_April.pdf">http://clubs.akc.org/brit/ClubPremiums/CentralMaineHT_April.pdf</a></div>
<br />
<div>
Maine's only pointing breeds hunt test, easily located off of I-95</div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-59039629364054674732013-02-28T13:09:00.000-08:002013-02-28T13:28:50.243-08:00Bangor Daily News - Maine Hunting and Sporting Dog Owners BlogToday I am reactiving this blog due to the unexpected news that Bangor Daily News has archived and suspended publication of my Maine Hunting and Sporting Dog Owners blog on their online newspaper website. I do have a phone call and an email in to the Bangor Daily News in hopes of having the blog reactivated there. In October 2011 Bangor Daily News contacted us about importing this blog to their online website, something which we glady agreed to. I was very proud and pleased to be one of the first 10 blogs to go live with Bangor Daily News. I sure hope that my blog will soon be back online there. (Unfortunately at this point in time I do not have access to all the original content which I published there but I also remain hopeful to resolve that.) So, here we are - back again! ~ AnnHunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-44103346459495192842011-10-08T16:43:00.000-07:002011-10-09T08:39:49.502-07:00Forum for Responsible Dog Owners Who Enjoy Hunting With Their Dogs<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>Follow link below for CURRENT POSTS:</strong><br />
<a href="http://sportdogs.bangordailynews.com/"><span style="background-color: yellow; color: #660000; font-size: large;"><strong>MAINE SPORTING & HUNTING DOG OWNERS</strong></span></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://sportdogs.bangordailynews.com/">http://sportdogs.bangordailynews.com/</a></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: justify;">Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners is extremely proud to announce that we are now being hosted by <a href="http://bangordailynews.com/">The Bangor Daily News</a> through their <a href="http://bangordailynews.com/living/living-blogs/">Maine Living</a> blogs! We will better meet the needs of those who follow this blog as a "forum for responsible dog owners who enjoy hunting with their dogs." The complete blog was imported to Bangor Daily News just a few days ago including all of our archived posts. (I left just a couple here in hopes they would entice new readers to travel over to BDN!)</div><br />
There are many reasons for us to be excited about this change including the following: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><em>"The BDN is notable in the newspaper business for having an extremely large coverage area. The BDN's print circulation area covers a large portion of mostly rural Maine that is larger than Connecticut and includes eight of Maine's 16 counties, geographically covering 68% of the state, although the population in that area is less than in the remaining 32%. Online, the BDN has readership throughout the state. </em><em>The BDN publishes online throughout the day, seven days a week, and in print six days a week. In its history, the BDN has only failed to publish once: on December 30, 1962, after an unexpected blizzard buried Bangor under five feet of snow. Numbers from online analytics firm Compete.com show the paper's website gets nearly 300,000 unique visitors per month, making it the largest news site in the state</em>."</span> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangor_Daily_News"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">SOURCE</span></a></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: justify;">We think it's a great opportunity to further educate the public about the issues important to Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners as a blog hosted by <a href="http://bangordailynews.com/">Bangor Daily News</a>! </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: justify;">Sincerely,</div><div style="text-align: justify;">John A. & Ann H. Short</div><div style="text-align: justify;">Maine Sporting & Hunting Dog Owners</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div>Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-15668988157951540372011-08-12T09:55:00.000-07:002011-10-09T08:19:00.994-07:00Just Sayin: Animal Welfare / Animal Rights - Again<strong>Hear My Heart</strong><br />
Mid summer legislative issues affecting Maine hunting and sporting dog owners are a little on the quiet side. Although there is a lot of work going on behind the scenes there isn't much to share here. It seems like it would be a good time to offer this excerpt from a published article I wrote for the <a href="http://clubs.akc.org/brit/">American Brittany Club</a> after attending the 2008 <a href="http://www.naiaonline.org/">National Animal Interest Alliance Conference</a> as representatative for the ABC: <br />
<br />
"...All responsible animal owners must recognize, be concerned with, and remain current about the ongoing, aggressive animal rights movement. It is extremely important to understand the meaning behind particular words used when ‘animal rights’ and/or ‘animal welfare’ is discussed. Often used interchangeably, these terms can be poles apart.<br />
<br />
For our purposes here, “animal rights” typically is a term used to describe a political, radical movement opposing the use of ALL animals for ANY purpose. Although the AR (animal rights) movement attempts to lower the status of human beings to the same level of animals by giving “rights” to animals, it is an extreme movement with an ulterior motive, “the extinction of domestic animals.”<br />
<br />
The AR movement is active in each state, persuading legislators to create new animal welfare laws and ordinances, often empowering local, state and federal government to intrude into the lives of responsible animal owners. Although states already have existing animal welfare laws in place, many of the new laws are invasive and often dictate to responsible animal owners the manner in which they MUST care for the animals they own or that are in their care.<br />
<br />
The term “Animal Welfare” most often clarifies for citizens the right to provide responsible care for an animal humanely and supports existing animal welfare laws. Primarily, animal welfare preserves the constitutional rights of the American citizen to own an animal and to make responsible decisions for their proper care and well-being without local, state, or federal intervention. In general, advocates of animal welfare know laws preventing cruelty, abuse, or neglect of animals are absolutely necessary and all want to see animals treated humanely. On the other hand, animal welfare advocates strongly oppose the progression of increasingly restrictive laws for animal owners:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Rabies vaccine requirements/reported to the State</li>
<li>Mandated age of rabies vaccine</li>
<li>Basic Leash Laws </li>
<li>Anti-Cruelty Laws</li>
<li>Zoning/Nuisance Ordinances</li>
<li>Breeding Permits</li>
<li>Ownership limits</li>
<li>Guardianship vs. Ownership</li>
<li>Consumer protection/animal ‘lemon laws’</li>
<li>Breed Specific Laws/Dangerous Dog ordinances</li>
<li>Anti-tethering, anti-crating </li>
<li>Prohibition of dogs left in cars, etc.</li>
<li>Anti-breeding laws </li>
<li>Mandatory spay and neuter laws</li>
<li>Regulated/specific amounts of daily exercise</li>
<li>Size of kennels, materials used in construction</li>
<li>State mandated veterinary care</li>
</ul> Often, at first glance, such laws and ordinances appear to be written with a genuine concern for the welfare of animals. And perhaps they are. On the surface, responsible animal owners and legislators could easily agree with any given ‘concept.’ Unfortunately, this is a problem. Most states already have existing animal welfare laws in effect. New ‘concept’ type laws are a duplication of current law but with strict and insidious implications. Often, incomplete and vaguely written laws and ordinances are presented “in concept”. State officials then are heavily lobbied by the AR movement. The true ‘experts’ (responsible and experienced animal owners, trainers, breeders, handlers, etc.) are rarely consulted to explain why the new laws are unfair and unmerited. A quick glance at recent issues in California, Kentucky, Maine, Pennsylvania, Ohio etc. confirms this reality.<br />
<br />
The political arm of the Animal Rights agenda is extending itself state by state. New vague ‘concept’ drafts, proposals, ordinances etc. are introduced with alarming frequency. Even more alarming is the speed in which the new laws become effective. Unaware citizens who are responsible animal owners suddenly find they are not in compliance with these laws. In many cases, people are not even aware of them.<br />
<br />
For example, John Q. Public, wishing to be a law abiding citizen will submit to a unwarranted “inspection” of his home and property by a government official. Based on how the “official” interprets the [hypothetical] new law, John Q. Public is at risk of his animals being seized as a result of the ‘inspection.’ The new law includes regulating the type of water bucket, size and materials of leash/collar to be used, and which materials are permissible to use in constructing a dog house/kennel. The state official discovers the responsible dog owner has not cared for his animals in the manner in which the new law/ordinance dictates. The owner is charged with animal abuse and neglect. His dogs are removed from his property.<br />
<br />
Responsible dog owners often are unaware the Animal Rights movement would like to stop the breeding of purebred dogs. ALL BREEDING. One group promotes ‘anti breeding workshops.’ Their goal is for the public to look at breeding dogs in the same way they compare drunk driving and smoking. An extreme analogy, but AR extremists are entrenched in the political process and are often well established with state officials, thus appearing as credible sources. <br />
<br />
Make no mistake, as the emphasis to eliminate breeding and animal ownership continues, division among breeders, shelters, rescue groups, local humane societies, dog fanciers, sportsmen, etc. (those who should be united) will intensify. The AR movement has already had great success. Likewise, hearts of many dog owners appear full of indifference and lack of concern. This obvious apathy must be overcome, but how? Animal owners face a “clear and present danger” far greater than the threat of losing the right to own and care for animals. Although a very real threat, it is simply a poster child for the complete AR agenda. A sense of alarm is felt within the hearts of those who understand the reality of what lies ahead. The AR movement cannot be overpowered unless animal owners unite to face the danger head on, draw a line in the sand declaring “not one step further.” <br />
<br />
It begins as each person becomes familiar with existing animal welfare laws in their state of residence. The learning experience continues by knowing what new concepts and amendments are under consideration for introduction to the state legislature. Each state legislature has a governmental website with a link on it that can be used to monitor upcoming legislation. By quickly searching for key words access is easily gained to state documents etc. pertaining to issues of concern to responsible animal owners. Individuals can gather information for themselves. They can then disseminate information to other interested parties.<br />
<br />
Local and regional dog clubs exist within most states with a wide and diverse membership. Interests range from hunting, agility, field trials, obedience, sledding, tracking, showing, etc. In many states a Federation of Dog Clubs work together to communicate information. This is a great place to give and receive information. The AKC website lists the contact information for these state Federations of Dog Clubs. Likewise breed clubs often work together to heighten awareness among members who may be oblivious to the severity of the AR movement. <em>I highly recommend spending time on the Sportsmens and Animal Owners Alliance <a href="http://saova.org/news.html">(SAOVA) website</a> and <a href="http://saovanews.blogspot.com/">their blog</a> for extremely accurate and current information.</em> <br />
<br />
It is important to know how local, state, and federal representatives and senators stand on animal rights vs. animal welfare issues as defined here, and to be accountable to better educate them. Sometimes, because they have only heard one side, well intentioned legislators unknowingly support a bill that will hurt responsible animal owners. Most often, legislators are easily accessible, and want to hear from their constituents. The true “experts” are owners with years of experience and legislators will view them as credible resources with factual information. <br />
<br />
<div></div>In addition to legislators, the local media can benefit from factual data based on our real life experiences. Opinion Educational (op-ed) pieces can be submitted along with Letters to the Editor relative to these issues. Learn the ins and outs, and successful methods of getting something written or published. Contact reporters personally and invite them to sit down with you and discuss your reasonable concerns. As we begin to be taken seriously, it is important to remember not to discredit ourselves by demonizing the enemy publicly.<br />
<br />
Responsible animal owners can learn to promote the message of animal welfare to it’s essence, to it’s most basic form in a credible, professional, respectful manner. While we absolutely do care deeply about the issues of animal welfare we must refuse to join in with the radical extremism of animal rights while explaining the reasons for our opposition to specific legislation articulately. It is possible to present factual information about the bond between humans and animals, to appeal to others through a sincere love and concern of the animals we own and use in our lives. We already KNOW how to care for animals and will always seek to improve upon their welfare. But without the state intervention that ARA so desperately ask for. <br />
<br />
The animal rights movement uses emotionalism and sensationalism to promote their agenda, to influence media, legislators, and others, and that speaks for itself. Everyone agrees and accepts without hesitation real animal cruelty and abuse exists but it will never be eradicated by following the AR agenda. <br />
<br />
This is a new and proactive era for animal welfare advocates. A positive and time honored message about the benefits and experiences of owning animals is a reality. Many well-defined and documented facts exist to support our concerns, which are no longer noise in the background, easily ignored or dismissed as irrational. Instead, voices rise up clearly as voices of logic, common sense, and unity.<br />
<br />
From Maine to California, numbers grow as hundreds of responsible animal owners embrace once again the authenticity of the unique bond that has always existed between people and the animals they love. In most cases, the very best care is already afforded them. It is time all owners, breeders, rescue groups, fanciers, etc. unite together on this bandwagon regardless of our differences. No more compromises..." <br />
<br />
<strong>That's all folks! Errr... no, not quite...</strong><br />
<br />
I have been thinking about some of the words used when discussing animals now, specifically dogs. I'll call them 'new age' terms, words that are acceptable and 'politically correct.' I think they are supposed to give people a warm and fuzzy feeling but it doesn't have that affect upon me at all. As a matter of fact I just came across <a href="http://www.alldogsacademy.com/content/view/450/5/">a great opinion article that is wonderfully researched written by Gail Fisher</a> about the dangers of being politically correct and literally stressing the fact that dog owners and dog trainers must not buy into all this new terminology. She writes and I quote "<em>If we buy into “guardianship” because “what difference does it make,” we are supporting our own demise and are in danger of losing the very ability to have and keep pets. Which bring me to the second prong of the animal rights movement—the law. Changing the word from “owner” to “guardian,” “custodian,” “keeper” or any other term does not convey the constitutionally protected rights of “ownership.” Sitting still for such a change is short-sighted and dangerous</em>." <br />
<br />
But that's just one of many changes. Consider other terms you probably use now without giving it a second thought. Words that offer a warm and fuzzy feel, words that are most definitely 'politically correct'! Has anyone noticed that we are no longer using the word "PET" anymore? Does anyone even care? Well, here is a very interesting quote which I discovered. We can assume that given the influence [sic] that HSUS has that the philosophy here actually contributed somehow to the change from pet to companion. <em>"Michael W. Fox, vice-president of the Humane Society, said that, "to call an animal with whom you share your life a 'pet,' is reminiscent of men's magazines where you (a figure of speech, don't take it personally) have the Pet of the Month." It is supposed that the continued use of the word "pet" to designate dogs or cats threatens to reduce their level of respect to the current status of twentieth century North American women. Now that's radical." ~The McGill Red Herring "</em><br />
<br />
I use the word "companion" all the time! My husband John and I are breeders of 'companion hunting dogs' and I never gave that term much thought. I like using that word. But have I too been so conditioned to think that it is somehow wrong to say we breed Brittanys for bird hunting purposes who are also family pets? Because that's what we do. (I am in danger of going off on a tangent here, something I've not done for quite awhile. I am going to fight the urge to share details behind the frustration I felt while John and I attended a press conference with Maines Attorney General and a State Senator who put the word puppy mill - which is NOT not a legal term and has no clear definition - and dog breeder in the same sentence as if to indicate they are one in the same.) I even hesitate to use the word 'breeder' without the popular and necessary prefix 'responsible' in front of it. In fact anyone who BUYS a Brittany puppy from us must be a 'responsible' dog owner. But I digress, or do I?<br />
<br />
<div></div><strong>BUYING vs ADOPTING</strong> <br />
<div>It seems like BUYING a dog is considered as something shameful. People don't even want to admit they BOUGHT a dog - let alone they BOUGHT it from a BREEDER!! Instead everyone wants to say they have adopted their dog. But in reality these days, ADOPTING has become big business. And ironically, ADOPTIONS occur at PET STORES! The same pet stores that sign the HSUS pledge that they will not sell puppies. Hmmm... Mobile adoption centers are set up at many pet stores. Week after week, everywhere...</div><br />
And herein lies a very 'elementary' conclusion:<br />
<ul><li><strong><span style="font-size: large;">A</span></strong>dopting is in - Buying is out</li>
<li><strong><span style="font-size: large;">B</span></strong>reeders are out - Shelters/Rescues are in</li>
<li><strong><span style="font-size: large;">C</span></strong>ompanion is in - Pet is Out</li>
</ul>Just Sayin'!<br />
<br />
Permission is granted by Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners to freely distribute or repost this article if done so in it's entirety provided credit is given to Maine-HSDO and to Ann Short, Author.Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-1490232034866181962011-05-01T11:15:00.000-07:002011-05-01T11:15:00.079-07:00PUREBRED DOGS: An Endangered Animal<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>PUREBRED DOGS</strong>: <strong>An Endangered Animal</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;">By Ann H. Short - May 1, 2011</div><br />
It’s amazing what bizarre thoughts randomly creep into one’s “writing mind” when the decision is made to sleep in on a Sunday morning. Lying in bed, drifting in and out of a dream state, I found myself conjuring up slogans for bumper stickers. I said this was bizarre. There are bumper stickers supporting the theme of ‘Save a Life, Adopt a Pet’. In Maine we have a specialty license to support the animal welfare program which says “Respect. Love. Adopt.” All very nice and I applaud folks efforts to do the right thing. But doing the right thing may not ALWAYS be the best thing to do. <br />
<br />
But while we’re on the subject, it’s been suggested that I don’t support Maine’s program. That’s not true at all. Before I go any further I feel a need to offer a disclosure statement explaining that I am a breeder of purebred dogs with a purposeful breeding program. I also support the efforts of and recognize the important role that rescue groups and shelters play. But all of us are aware of a decrease in the number of purebred animals due in part to a message of mandatory spay/neuter of all pets which has permeated every factor. Individuals owning an intact animal (not involved in a breeding program or under consideration for a conformation title) feels embarrassed or a sense of shame about it. Breeders who decide to sell animals without a mandatory spay/neuter contract are frowned upon. There are those who degrade those breeders of purebred animals who make a small profit, promote a particular breed, engage in selective breeding and/or provide purpose bred animals. Based on my own personal experience and that of other breeders (dogs and/or cats) I believe it is fair to say we live in an age where an undercurrent of misguided contempt exists towards all breeders. The assumption is that “WE” are the reason for pet overpopulation in the shelters. If that is true, then why are thousands of animals imported from out of state and out of the country to fill empty shelters? Animals that frequently carry disease? There often is a notable breakdown of communication, support, and cooperation among breeders, rescue groups and humane societies as the current trend is to define each other by using words as reputable, responsible, etc. An omission of use of these terms in general conversation can cause eyebrows to lift, suspicions to arise, and fingers to point regarding who is or who is not. Simply said, there are factions of division occurring at every level involving all concerned with animal welfare. There is a need for ongoing, valuable and productive discussions to be held regarding the pet importation problems, mandatory spay/neuter laws, etc. among all of us. But I think it’s time to start paying closer attention to the decline in the number of purebred animals. Contrary to popular belief among ‘some’ animal advocacy groups, this decline is NOT a good thing. <br />
<br />
Despite the questions and concerns voiced by many regarding AKC’s policies, overall objective for the future, and recent changes it is a valuable statistical resource on many levels especially in regards to number of dogs. There have been sharp declines in the number of AKC dog registrations and the numbers for all purebred animals are thought to be on the decline as well. I’m not worried about the future of AKC, that isn’t my problem. I am more concerned however about the future of purebred domestic animals and in particular - dogs. <br />
<br />
Each year hundreds of new laws aimed at protecting the rights of animals are passed. I’m all for eliminating animal abuse, neglect, and cruelty and will always support and work towards reasonable animal welfare laws. But I do feel a very real and present danger exists for purebred dog and cat breeders effected by well-intentioned legislation. Competent breeders of purebred animals who willingly comply with state animal welfare laws continue to experience the reality of ever increasing rules and regulations aimed at protecting animals. I live in a state ranked #3 in the country for the strongest animal protection laws. Some consider that to be very positive. Others consider that to be very restrictive. Animal owners are experiencing increased regulations that take away their right to govern and care for their animals without strict government oversight. Not only are breeders of purebred dogs in danger of eventually being regulated out of existence, but so is the purebred dog itself. And my fear is that it will happen without public notice. <br />
<br />
The road to an animal becoming extinct includes these three paths: Threatened Species, Endangered Species, and Extinct Species. Animals with small populations are likely to become endangered at some point in the future. Endangered animals are those whose numbers are decreasing in numbers, at risk of becoming extinct, and threatened by various, changing parameters. Extinct animals cease to exist, they have died out, and no longer live on earth. We can go to any zoo and observe captive populations of many endangered animals. These individuals are bred in captivity where some genetic variation of their original form is sustained. SOME species exist ONLY in captivity in a controlled, managed environment. Once a threatened or endangered species become extinct, they are gone forever. Could this actually happen to all dogs? Without purebred dogs, there will be no mixed breed dogs, there will be no expensive designer doodley doo dogs, there will be no oops litters, there won’t even be any strays to rescue and so on and so forth. There simply will be no dogs. Period. <br />
<br />
There’s a poster I’ve seen with a photograph of a dog leash attached to an empty dog collar and asks the question “Where Did all the Dogs Go?” It further states that “If we spay and neuter all dogs and ban all breeding, where will it lead?” I’m here to say it very well could lead to purebred dogs easily falling into one of the above catagories. I don’t want my great grandchildren to experience the reality of buying an admission ticket for a special zoo attraction of a purebred dog. Can you imagine, a special section of the zoo dedicated to the “Canis Genus” (Domestic dog) containing barred enclosures with reproductions of natural habitats, depicting the original purpose of a particular breed. Think of seeing a Brittany dog, a dog bred for hunting, demonstrating in an artificial natural habitat the manner in which it once scented, pointed and found upland game. Imagine a similar demonstration depicting a member of the herding breed, simulating a round up of farmers sheep. Do you get the picture? <br />
<br />
Sheep, counting sheep, I must have counted one too many this morning when I decided to sleep in. Which brings me back to the beginning of my story where my day started with thoughts of bumper stickers. I’m not sure if rambling from my soap box in hopes of sounding a clear clarion call for those with ears to hear can make a difference or not. I’d like to think so. I know this is extreme, but extreme is what got us all into this situation in the first place if you catch my drift. In the meantime I think I have a good idea for a new bumper sticker. Stay tuned.<br />
<br />
Ann H. Short<br />
<a href="http://mainehdo.blogspot.com/">Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners</a><br />
Permission given by author to crosspost in it's entiretyHunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-29628370195794940372010-11-05T08:17:00.000-07:002010-11-05T08:21:24.089-07:00One Moment in Time for all of us...Based on experience in the government affairs office of a state university system following elections I advise the following: writing individual letters to newly elected legislators, congratulate them, introduce ourselves as dog, cat owners/breeders etc., explain our interests and concern and welcome them aboard. This could be done in a couple of different ways and at different times. It would seem obvious to write to those who upseated legislators with a strong record of support for animal RIGHTS. Write to your own local, district legislators. As the committee assignments are announced, then contact those are assigned accordingly especially (in Maine) pertaining to the Ag Committee. <br />
<br />
Additionally a congratulatory letter to incumbents who won their campaign is important, also on an individual basis. This will serve to continue to solidify the good relationships that are already established. <br />
<br />
This will be specific in many cases to the various new composition of committees etc. most often involved with our interests.<br />
<br />
Official letters of congratulation, re-introductions etc. from organized non-profits, clubs or associations (dog, cat, equine, etc.) 'we' are aligned with also needs to send an official letter out, on letterhead/stationary etc. A properly written business letter. Go to your boards and your officers and request an official letter be sent if you belong to such organizations.<br />
<br />
I would also like to discourage anyone from writing generic form letters. Our elected officials deserve our respect, honesty, and candid approach. In this political climate which includes strong and powerful pressure from influential animal rights groups it is important to explain fact based fears and our concerns. <br />
<br />
This is our moment in time friends, a moment to sieze and to use wisely laying a foundation early and quickly. What I am suggesting here is nothing new and is common practice all across the country in various institutions and organizations. We have not passed this way before and we may never pass this way again. The political climate is changing drastically and while we may not all agree with the outcome for various reasons - we have the future of our animals and our right to care for and own them at stake, along with many other concerns. If this is the platform you or I have been called to be involved with, then let us do it well and with intelligence. SEIZE this moment. And seize it often. <br />
<br />
In my own state of Maine, I find that referring to the list of endorsements found on the <a href="http://saova.org/">Sportsmen and Animal Owners Voting Alliance</a> http://saova.org/ has been invaluable. There is similar information there regarding all the other states as well. I work most closely with SAOVA as their Maine representative however have positive relationships with other key groups across the state and the country.<br />
<br />
Additionally John and I plan to move ahead in a more official capacity regarding our own grassroots movement "Maine Hunting & Sporting Dogs Owners". Maine continues to establish a strong interstate network of communication regarding legislative issues of concern to animal owners, breeders, hunters etc. There is room for everyone to be a part of this. Maine also has reached out and touched other groups all across the country. In as much momentum we have gained in recent years, it is important for us to double our efforts. We're all well positioned and we are certainly much more aware of what is at stake now more than ever before. Having positive, credible, and professional relationships begins with these small steps today. Thank you and God bless you!<br />
<br />
Sincerely,<br />
John and Ann Short<br />
Maine Sporting and Hunting Dog Owners<br />
<a href="http://mainehdo.blogspot.com/">http://mainehdo.blogspot.com/</a>Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-68528196339121661892010-04-22T07:45:00.000-07:002010-04-22T07:45:08.704-07:00SAOVA LEGISLATIVE AWARDS<a href="http://www.saova.org/awards.html">SAOVA LEGISLATIVE AWARDS</a>: "'This award was unexpected and I am greatly honored by it. My work on the animal fighting paraphernalia bill came about because of the overwhelming email and phone response I received from dog breeders, trainers and groomers last year. Having been a dog trainer, I understood their concern and knew that gaining support from my fellow legislators to defeat LD 186 was the only way to protect these owners, breeders and trainers from being lumped in with those individuals involved in illegal animal fighting.' Senator Stan Gerzofsky (ME)"Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-79574283690922449252010-04-02T19:14:00.000-07:002010-04-02T19:14:07.894-07:00SAOVA - Maine Legislator of the Year, Senator GerzofskyNews from the Maine Senate Majority Office<br />
Senator Stan Gerzofsky<br />
www.mainesenate.org/gerzofsky <br />
For Immediate Release — Friday, April 2, 2010<br />
Contact: Tiffany Leonard — (207) 287-1515<br />
<br />
-- Media Advisory --<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><strong>Senator Stan Gerzofsky, Maine Legislator of the Year 2009</strong></span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLtfpujgjikv7nIwKeV7C4RxoPzBZuEb5Z1jMWimg1EjWoD1mo4J0tD3dD6bUi63W_HPLK2tZBcXYQpU4Rf_x3uweI7iOO1YkLoe3wYRxdmPafFidt08uvwUUrr-mgFfNHcg9xzzp7rzn-/s1600/SAOVA+Leg+of+Year+Award.+April+2010+(2).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" nt="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLtfpujgjikv7nIwKeV7C4RxoPzBZuEb5Z1jMWimg1EjWoD1mo4J0tD3dD6bUi63W_HPLK2tZBcXYQpU4Rf_x3uweI7iOO1YkLoe3wYRxdmPafFidt08uvwUUrr-mgFfNHcg9xzzp7rzn-/s320/SAOVA+Leg+of+Year+Award.+April+2010+(2).jpg" /></a></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>AUGUSTA</strong> – The <a href="http://saova.org/">Sportsmen & Animal Owners’ Voting Alliance</a> (SAOVA), a nationwide nonpartisan organization of animal owners and sportsmen, today named Senator Stan Gerzofsky (D-Cumberland County), “Legislator of the Year 2009.” </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: justify;">Susan Wolf, President of SAOVA, indicated that Gerzofsky’s commitment to continue working with animal owners and sportsmen to preserve property rights and assure the protection of the sporting heritage that Maine is known for, clearly distinguished him among other nominees for this award. Most notably, in 2009, Senator Gerzofsky listened to the concerns of hunting and sporting dog owners and strongly opposed LD 186, a bill involving the banning of animal fighting paraphernalia. Gerzofsky, a dog trainer himself, knew the bill had the potential to negatively impact responsible dog owners, especially those who train dogs for hunting and whose tools of the trade were being called into question. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: justify;">“This award was unexpected and I am greatly honored by it,” Senator Gerzofsky said. “My work on the animal fighting paraphernalia bill came about because of the overwhelming email and phone response I received from dog breeders, trainers and groomers last year. Having been a dog trainer, I understood their concern and knew that gaining support from my fellow legislators to defeat LD 186 was the only way to protect these owners, breeders and trainers from being lumped in with those individuals involved in illegal animal fighting.”</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: justify;">The State of Maine has some of the best animal protection laws in the nation and is one of 45 states who list animal fighting as a felony. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: justify;">John and Ann Short of <a href="http://mainehdo.blogspot.com/">Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners</a> presented the award on behalf of the SAOVA. Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners is a grassroots initiative that monitors legislation of interest for Maine sportsmen and women, as well as others concerned about the animal rights movement here in the state.</div>====================================================================Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-67731727114160929312009-10-16T08:18:00.000-07:002009-10-16T08:48:57.571-07:00Of Parasites, Hunting Dogs, and Maine Animal Rights<div align="justify"><span style="color:#009900;"><em>NOTE: The Maine Sportsman - New England's Largest Outdoor Publication - published the following story which I wrote for their May 2009 edition. The original title was "Of Parasites and Hunting Dogs" and was published as 'Parasites' Are Infecting Maine Legislation." It appeared in the Other Voices column on page 12.</em></span><br /><br />"Harry <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">Vanderweide's</span></span> February column "Ramblings"uniquely addressed the issue of 'animal rights' or AR. Harry asked, "Do Intestinal Parasites, Have Animal' Rights?" I appreciate his question. It increases awareness of the invasive nature of a particular parasite, the AR/antis movement that has reached epidemic proportions in Maine.<br /><br />According to the 2008 Report of the Animal Legal Defense Fund 3,400 animal welfare . statutes were reviewed from 50 states including <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-error">Puerto</span></span> Rico, and the Virgin Islands. The report lists Maine in the top five for best state animal protection laws. In other words, if parasites did have animal rights, Maine would be a safe haven. To be sure, Maine has the perfect environment for the growth of the AR movement.<br /><br />Take into account that a principal lobbyist for the Humane Society of the United States (<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-error">HSUS</span></span>) personally works within the Maine Legislature. <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error">HSUS</span></span> claims to be a friend to animals but definitely is not a friend to Maine sportsmen and women. When legislation is introduced to protect the "rights" of animals, frequently the rights of people decrease. No wonder so many animal owners, sportsmen and women in Maine are suspicious of animal welfare bills.<br /><br />Consider the strong emotions stirred up in hunters and trappers when legislation is introduced with language such as, "will ban trapping, hunting with hounds, or amend hunting laws." The AR/antis' goal to ban all hunting and trapping is known and documented. Consequently, the initial reaction of many Maine sportsmen and woman concerning such laws is one of alarm, even if proposed legislation supports their interests.<br /><br />Dog owners react just as strongly and are equally suspicious. Animal welfare laws threatening to restrict and regulate the most basic dog ownership is on the rise. There is deep pride in owning a fine, working hunting dog responsibly bred for a specific purpose. "Fido" is also loved and enjoyed as a family pet. Owners who breed dogs occasionally, show dogs, compete with dogs, own multiple dogs, or hunt with their dogs should all be concerned. The parasitic AR epidemic seeks an end to all animal ownership and all breeding. It does not discriminate.<br /><br />Recently, my husband and I 'attended a public legislative hearing on SP57, an "act to extend the season for training dogs." As owners of hunting dogs, this vague "concept" draft attracted our attention. We learned the focus of this legislation includes the amount of time bear hunters are permitted to train dogs. A majority of bear hunters support it. Perhaps SP57 is not AR legislation but it does demonstrate the importance of monitoring legislation.<br /><br />Maine animal welfare laws are in a constant state of revision. Amendments and new laws are frequently added to protect against the abuses of animal cruelty and neglect. Why not enforce the existing laws? The abuse is that laws intended to protect the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-error">so called </span>rights of animals negatively impact and seriously restrict the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-error">constitutional </span>rights of responsible <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6" class="blsp-spelling-error">animal </span>owners. There is no clear def<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-error">inition</span></span> of animal rights.<br /><br />American Kennel <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8" class="blsp-spelling-error">Club </span>statistics for January <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_9" class="blsp-spelling-error">and F</span><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-error">ebruary</span> 2009 indicate 200 pieces of AR legislation were introduced nationally. These bills include breed <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_11" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6" class="blsp-spelling-error">specifc</span> </span>legislation, strict anti-b<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_12" class="blsp-spelling-error">reeding </span>bills, mandatory spay/<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_13" class="blsp-spelling-error">neuter, </span>limiting the practices of cropping tails, restricting the s<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_14" class="blsp-spelling-error">ale </span>of puppies and increased license fees. In Maine, specif<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_15" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7" class="blsp-spelling-error">ic</span></span> bills monitored by <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_16" class="blsp-spelling-error">hunting </span>dog owners refer to "dangerous dogs," animal <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_17" class="blsp-spelling-error">fighting </span>"paraphernalia," vendor/<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_18" class="blsp-spelling-error">seller </span>licenses, raising fees, limited number of dogs and <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_19" class="blsp-spelling-error">tethering </span>restrictions.<br /><br />Sportsmen and women have experience opposing the antis. Dog owners have only just begun. The AR terms "canned hunting" and "<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_20" class="blsp-spelling-error">puppy </span>mills" powerfully divide the general public into extremes. Sportsmen and women and dog owners need to unite now against the outbreak of the parasitic AR epidemic in Maine. We can learn a lot from each other.<br /><br />Speaking of parasites, if a dog has fleas in Maine, you risk losing your dog. No kidding."<br /><br /><em>Writer Ann Short and her husband John of 34 years own, hunt, show, train and raise <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_25" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8" class="blsp-spelling-error">Brittanys</span></span>. In an effort to build bridges and foster good relationship between all groups effected by the animal rights agenda, they are establishing a statewide grassroots network to communicate legislative information. Both are strong supporters of reasonable animal welfare laws while <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_9" class="blsp-spelling-error">protecing</span> the rights of animal owners. </em></div>Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-50110347862429399362009-06-04T18:26:00.000-07:002009-06-04T18:38:24.504-07:00LD 964 - Not reported out 6/4/09HB 666 / LD 964 -An Act Pertaining to the Breeding and Selling of Dogs and Cats<br />Status In Committee<br /><br />Latest Committee Action: VOTED, May 29, 2009, OTP-AM<br /><br /><a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?ld=964&PID=1456&snum=124&sec3"><strong>Committee Report: Not Reported Out</strong></a><br /><br /><a href="http://janus.state.me.us/legis/LawMakerWeb/amendments.asp?ID=280031764">Amendments to HP 666 / LD 964: None </a>Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-84797629829077054882009-06-02T07:06:00.001-07:002009-06-02T10:31:26.765-07:00Still Opposed to LD 964?You're not alone.<br />This bill will do more to damage the future quality and quantity of Maine sporting, hunting, and hound dogs than any piece of legislation proposed in recent years. It is an incremental step in a much larger agenda of challenging the concept of owning pets and stopping what the animal right percieves as the "unethical practice" of purebred animals. This bill will effectively compress the supply and diminish the quality of sporting dogs for Maine citizens.<br /><br />Many responsible Maine dog owners operate the most outstanding reputable, ethical, breeding kennels. Kennels like this include the best sporting dogs in the state...PERIOD. Retrievers such as Labradors and Goldens, Spaniels like Springers, Field and Cockers, Hounds like Walkers Black and Tans, Redbones, Blueticks, Beagles, Pointers like Shorthairs, Brittanies, Wirehairs and English, Setters like English, Red, Irish, and Gordons.<br /><br />There are those who in the state legislature who say any breeder or kennel who opposes LD 964 must be hiding something, they are the ones who do not license their dogs. The fact of the matter is these kennels are open to the public, and those who are reputable and ethical, are in the majority - and proud to show off their breeding program.<br /><br />This group of responsible dog owners believes:<br />LD 964 will tighten restrictions on all reputable breeders<br />LD 964 is expensive and places additional burdens on responsible breeders<br />LD 964 does nothing to protect animals<br />LD 964 will further motivate irresponsible breeders to avoid licensing<br />LD 964 builds on the incrementalism strategy of the animal rights industry..<br /><br />The prevention and elimination of animal abuse, cruelty, and neglect are at the heart of the matter for responsible dog owners and breeders. LD 964 saw strong opposition when a tax surcharge on pet food was added to the existing language. That proposal was killed last Friday at the work session. Language which the responsible dog owners and breeders could support was added to the bill at the last moment.<br /><br />The 3 tiered breeding kennel definition with increased fees still exists.Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-66159433309881286622009-05-30T13:42:00.000-07:002009-05-30T15:11:02.203-07:00LD 964 Final Committee Report (MaineHDO and Kennebec Journal)Tax Proposal Fails<br />Additional Restrictions on Breeders Succeeds 5/29/09<br /><br /><br />Thank you to all who wrote and called the legislators in opposition to LD 964, whose title had been amended and proposed to read: An Act Pertaining to the Breeding and Selling of Dogs and Cats and Equitable Funding of Animal Welfare.' The proposal was defeated.We learned that in between Wednesday and Friday morning a substantial number of email and written letters were received in opposition to this bill and it's new proposed amendment, sight unseen. At the last minute many responsible, independent dog owners throughout the state who opposed LD 964 contacted the legislators for all the right reasons. The Federation of Maine Dog Clubs, The Maine Association of Animal Shelters, the Maine Municipal Association are among those who supported LD 964.<br /><br />Among those in strong opposition to LD 964 were Maine Hunting and Sporting Dog Owners, the Maine Merchants Association, Maine Grocers Association, Maine Farm Bureau Association, Hannaford Brothers, Sportsman and Animal Voters Alliance, National Animal Interest Allaince, American Sporting Dog Association, and the Pet Food Industry.<br /><br />Quotes from available written testimony submitted in the 24 hours prior to the meeting: "The concept of a 1% tax on pet food has not appeared in printed legislation. The bill to which the proposed tax would be added, LD 964, dealt with license fees for breeding kennels."<br /><br />"The tier system of defining breeding kennels and the additional 1% tax on pet food (on top of the 5% we already pay) is unfair to responsible dog owners and breederswhile ineffective in improving licensing compliance or true animal WELFARE - just as the poorly thought out surcharge on puppies sold was (which had to go back and berepealed) and now the vendors licenses, which though a good idea, the department is admittedly unable or unwilling to enforce."<br /><br />"We did not testify on the orginal bill, since [LD 964] had no direct impact on our sales of pet food... We believe that increasing the tax on pet foodwill make it increasingly difficult for many of our customers to feed, and therefore keep, their pets."<br /><br />"We could support funding a well managed and successful animal welfare program, with reasonable laws that foster trust between the department, legislators, and dog owners... LD 964 does little to promote responsible animal ownership, ethical breeding programs, or acceptable practices of animal husbandry.'"It would be grossly unfair that pet owners, especially those who already devote a great deal of their own personal time and money in efforts to educate the public about responsible pet ownership should bare the burden of the Animal Welfare Program. I would like to point out that since the citizens of Maine are already struggling financially, they would simply be forced to purchase cheaper pet food and their pets would receive poorer nutrition. That makes no sense at all. I would also like to ask the committee to vote no on LD 964. Much of it would require even more money to enforce and does not address the real problems of animal welfare in Maine. It specifically attacks those who are providing the citizens of Maine with well-bred and sound animals as well as those who, through their proven devotion to their animals, provide the education pet owners need. And at no cost to the taxpayer."<br /><br />"Instead of forcing the 40% of responsible owners who license their dogs and kennels properly to pay even more, why not make a real effort to enforce compliance from those who don’t bother to go by the rules. That alone would add another $700,000 to the AWP..."We were disappointed that less than 6 people were in attendance to represent responsible breeders at the work session. This was the most important work session of the year for what has always been essentially an anti-breeders bill. This perception was further evidenced by 'one Senators' remark that "many dog owners expressed their opposition to the bill but those dog owners are people who don't license their dogs anyway." More than one dog-owning committee member opposed this bill and most were offended by the comment.<br /><br />At the 'midnight hour' just before the committee voted on the bill it became clear that a very important request made by the Federation of Maine Dog Clubs for major/substantive language was not going to be honored. 'One Senator' said that routine/technical language had always been part of a particular process, and felt it should remain that way. His opinion was quickly dismissed by the majority of the committee when one member was alerted to the obvious omission of the language.<br /><br />LD 964 was voted - Ought to Pass as Amended and will go to the House next week. The breeding kennel definition language remains, a result of the LD 2010 task force group. The one consolation is the inclusion of the 'major/substantive language. Perhaps the legislature will entertain the concept of purpose driven kennel definitions however it was not mentioned in today's meeting.<br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br />Ann H. Short<br />AKC Legislative Liaison to the Central Maine Brittany Club<br />Member Maine Bird Dog Club<br />Maine Hunting / Sporting Dog Owners<br /><br /><a href="http://kennebecjournal.mainetoday.com/news/local/6403848.html">Kennebec Journal Report: </a><br />Augusta,ME,USA -- A legislative committee scrapped a proposal Friday to impose a 1 percent tax on pet food, saying the idea needs more public input. The Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry Committee was looking for a way to raise money for the state's animal welfare program.<br /><br />Initially, the committee approved for a new tax and reduce dog licensing fees to offset the cost of the tax. The committee reconsidered that vote Friday and decided to impose a series of minor changes. Rep. Nancy Smith, D-Monmouth, said she could not support the 1 percent tax. "This is not even a Band-Aid on a broken leg," she said. "We need to think bigger than we are here."<br /><br />The committee voted to look at the issue in the summer and possibly report back legislation next year. Some members felt the public did not have a chance to comment about the tax.<br /><br />Also, Rep. Wendy Pieh, D-Bremen, said she'd like to look at ways to give state animal control officials more power to decide the proper course of treatment for abused and neglected animals. She said the state spends thousands of dollars keeping injured animals alive that have been seized from abusive homes. "I'd like to take a look at how we can strengthen language that gives you more opportunity to make the decision as if it were your own pet," Pieh said to Norma Worley, who leads the state's animal welfare program.<br />Susan Cover -- 620-7015 scover@centralmaine.comHunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-1705077786748659292009-05-22T12:40:00.000-07:002011-10-09T09:33:47.315-07:00LD 964 - Opinion<span style="color: #000066;"><strong>Final LD 964 Work Session Tuesday, May 26</strong></span>Joint Committee on Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">It is unlikely that Maine's </span><a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_124th/billtexts/HP066601.asp"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">LD 964 </span></a><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">will be counted among those breeder bills that were defeated across the nation... instead, it may help the count of passed bills rise. If this occurs, Maine will join the MINORITY of states as reported below.<br />
<br />
As many of you know, The Sportsmen and Animal Owners Voting Alliance and other groups monitor animal rights industry legislation nationally. Accordingly, out of 30 specific Commercial Breeder bills associated with the animal rights industry followed across the country, current data supports the following (unofficial) statistics:<br />
<br />
DEFEATED: Commercial Breeder Bills: 16<br />
PENDING: 9<br />
PASSED: 5<br />
<br />
Maine's bill, LD 964 An Act Pertaining to the Breeding and Selling of Dogs and Cats, is identified as an HSUS Commercial Breeding Bill, and remains in the still pending column.<br />
<br />
<em>North Carolina is listed in the defeated column but they are waiting for the Rules Committee to make it's final determination whether or notthe breeder bills are worthy enough to survive the crossover deadline. The bills sponsor says it is dead. </em><br />
<br />
With the passage of LD 964 (with or without an amendment) the ever growing foundation of incrementalism increases in strength as it pertains to the animal rights industry in Maine - already touted as #3 State in the country for having the best animal protection laws according to the Animal Legal Defense Fund </span><a href="mhtml:%7BEA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C%7Dmid://00000063/!x-usc:http://www.aldf.org/"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">http://www.aldf.org/</span></a><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">. This rating points to Maine's success in restricting the rights of the people who responsiblyown, love, care for, and breed animals.<br />
<br />
Among those who oppose bills like LD 964 are the responsible hunting and sporting dog owners and breeders, often of multiple dogs. State based animal advocacy groups boldly disparage the actions of ALL responsible dog owners and breeders for speaking out against their industry. Members and leaders within some groups frequently criticize and accuse responsible dog owners and breeders saying they are against 'animal welfare reform.' (Yet another term introduced by the animal rights industry.)<br />
<br />
One claim is that responsible breeders opposing the animal rights industry will refuse inspections. There is nothing further from the truth for they are proud of their animals and the care they provide for them. It is the unwarranted, invasive, unjustified 'inspections'that they object to. Additionally, many responsible breeders believe the background check done on them before a breeding kennel license is issued is a form of profiling and unconstitutional. Their protests in these matters are justifiable.<br />
<br />
Responsible hunting and sporting dog owners and breeders in Maine continue to be verbally slammed as the mistruths about them spread. In April, during a Senate session, one very influential legislator loudly, unfairly and publically criticized a group that is representative of dog clubs in the state. It is difficult enough in Maine for responsible dog owners and breeders without condemnation coming from a leading Senator!<br />
<br />
Fortunately, there are many wonderful Maine legislators who have become sympathetic and supportive of specific concerns of responsible hunting and sporting dog owners and breeders. These legislators are very willing to listen and act on behalf of those who turn to them with legitimate fears pertaining to ever invasive and restrictive dog ownership laws. These legislators know that responsible dog owners and breeders care deeply about the welfare of the animals they own while understanding their rights to care for them are being unduly legislated. They understand owners of sporting and hunting dogsface a two edged sword because the animal rights industry detests hunting.<br />
<br />
Responsible owners of sporting and hunting dogs are a unique group with unique needs of representation at the state level. In recognition of this, their statewide grassroots movement of alliances continues to grow and expand. A concerted effort is underway to further establish themselves with an official announcement regarding this endeavor anticipated soon.<br />
<br />
LD 964 (LD 2010) An Act Pertaining to the Breeding and Selling of Dogs and Cats continues to morph far away from it's intended purpose. According to several reliable sources LD 964 appears to be alive and well. Chair of the Ag Committee, Senator Nutting, apparently may add an amendment to include lowering the dog license and municipal kennel license fees, turn all dog licensing fees over to the towns and create a NEW 1% sales tax on all pet food (excluding livestock food) and perhaps a 1% tax on horse tack. Estimates are that this will add $180,000 to the animal welfare program. A scrupulous review of the rest of this bill is necessary before deciding the reduced license fees are beneficial.<br />
<br />
The overall, original intent of this bill cannot be taken for granted. In the fall of 2007 this bill emerged as a concept draft of LD 2010 - known to everyone who has been following for almost 2 years as originally emerging as 'the puppy mill bill' (another AR term). The bill had little to do with substandard kennels and everything to do with regulating responsible dog owners and breeders further. Legislators and many stakeholders have worked at great length to try to resolve the conflicting issues within this bill at each juncture. Nearly 2 years later there is STILL no agreement. It is important to remember that in the fall of 2008 when the LD 2010 work group concluded their task, there was never any agreement on breeding kennel definitions. Once a bad bill, always a bad bill.<br />
<br />
The brand new 3 tiered breeding kennel licensing system is still part of the bill, and each new level of breeding kenneldefinition still has a price tag attached to it. Although some of the original language and sections of LD 964 have been changed/removed,the fact remains dog owners in Maine will go from having 1 breeding kennel definition with 1 set licensing fee - to now having several definitions based on the number of intact dogs and/or total number of dogs. The original proposed license fees were reduced somewhat, but the fact remains - the new definitionswill still result in higher fees and additional restrictions, limitations etc. Not to mention the new tax on pet food! LD 964 will directly effect all animal owners. Not too many people are paying attention to this fact though! Why?<br />
<br />
Many proponents of this bill support the tax incentive, feeling it spreads out the burden of financing the animal welfare program to other animal owners/users. Proponents want to help the animal welfare department with it's funding problems.<br />
<br />
Opponents of this bill and the tax incentive have remained steadfast in their opposition to LD 964 (LD 2010). The opposition may grow now with this proposed tax increase. There is a concern that this bill does little to ensure the welfare of dogs or cats or that it will aid in the elimination of animal abuse, neglector cruelty. Instead it appears to be a means to fund the severely over extended budget of the animal welfare program which is several hundredthousands of dollars in the red. Apparently there is a request for several hundred thousand more dollars to be added in the near future,just to keep the department in operation for this year.<br />
<br />
There is renewed hope for those on both sides of these issues (outside of the animal rights industry goals) to work more cooperatively in the future. Those who only see abuse tend to forget that those who daily live with, love and care for their dogs have a lot to offer along the way to eliminate TRUE animal cruelty and neglect. For the time being though, it is far wiser and safer for those on 'this' side of the issue, to proceed with extreme caution before sitting down to the table to agree to anything; present the position boldly, strongly, and with unwavering conviction. Although some may say this means being extreme, it's not. It simply means communicating a transparent and truthful message - enough is enough! Drawing a line and standing firm on it is much better than losing any ground we may gain by encroachment. Compromise may very well have a place in most instances. But those who grasp the reality of the movement and momentum of the animal rights industry will not take risks. Maine is being hijacked by the animal rights movement in the name of compromise.<br />
<br />
It seems more respect would be gained in the long run among constituents, stakeholders, legislators, and the department. A loud and noisy gong is one thing - a clear and clarion call is quite another. Can you hear it?<br />
<br />
The SAOVA link (see sidebar) </span><a href="mhtml:%7BEA96F35C-3C19-4B12-BC82-E65B23B1378C%7Dmid://00000063/!x-usc:http://saova.org/Maine.html"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">http://saova.org/Maine.html</span></a><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"> has information relative to contacting legislators and the committee. The Ag committee will meet on Tuesday May 26 for final committee vote on LD 964. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated.<br />
<br />
Respectfully written on behalf of responsible Maine Hunting/Sporting Dog Owners,<br />
<br />
Ann H. Short<br />
AKC Legislative Liaison<br />
SAOVA Maine Representative<br />
VP Central Maine Brittany Club<br />
Member Maine Bird Dog ClubMember National Animal Interest Alliance</span>Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8253061090447374615.post-67280417812878299402009-04-27T06:00:00.000-07:002009-05-30T13:04:04.710-07:00Killed Bills / Legislative Liaison Opinion 5/27/09The following bills supported by 'animal rights' advocacy groups have been killed in the 124th legislature:<br /><br />LD 412 (An Act to Create an Animal Welfare Trailer License Bill)<br /><br />LD 9 (An Act To Prohibit the Force-feeding of Birds This bill makes force-feeding birds in order to produce the food product known as foie gras a civil violation.)<br /><br />LD 560 (An Act To Ban the Hunting of Animals in Enclosed Areas)<br /><br />LD 988 (An Act To Increase the Penalty for Keeping a Dangerous Dog That Harms a Domesticated Animal)<br /><em><span style="color:#cc0000;">Maine Hunting Dog Owners testified in opposition.<br /></span></em><br />LD 1053 (An Act To Ensure Humane Dog and Cat Breeding in the State - Rep. Stevens bill, she withdrew it)<br /><br />==============================<br />This is a bill that needs to be killed:<br />LD 186 (An Act Pertaining to the Possession of Animal Fighting Paraphernalia) . NAIA issued an action alert to Maine citizens to contact their legislators. See additional history here on this blog.<br /><em><span style="color:#cc0000;">Maine Hunting Dog Owners testified in opposition.</span></em><br /><br />============================================<br /><br />On April 15th, the public hearings on 5 animal welfare bills were heavily attended. We are awaiting the date for the Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry work sessions to be scheduled. Much work is still to be done concerning these bill. <strong>LD 964, LD 1103 continue to be of special concern to Maine Hunting Dog Owners</strong>. <em><span style="color:#cc0000;"><strong>Maine Hunting Dog Owners testified in opposition to those two bills as they are written.</strong> </span></em><br /><em><span style="color:#cc0000;">We also oppose LD 879, LD 517 but did not testify. We testified in support of 454. We support LD 1286 but did not testify. We testified in opposition to LD 988, and this bill is dead. </span></em><br /><br />==============================================<br />Reponsible dog owners, breeders, animal owners and all concerned with the onslaught of animal rights legislation in Maine are in good hands.<br /><br />It cannot be said enough, there is a <a href="http://www.ncraoa.com/AR_VS_AW.html">huge difference between animal welfare and animal rights </a>and the more coalitions and alliances are formed among groups the better. The fact of the matter is - we all need each other! <br /><br /><strong>Now not all dog owners are hunters and not all hunters are dog owners. But we face a common foe - the animal rights industry</strong> - you know who I mean... In Maine, certain animal 'advocacy' groups have now started to publically demean the efforts of those who oppose them. Misquotes in media, verbal attacks on breeders, and even certain legislators publically criticizing mainstream groups in Maine who are working hard to educate the public, legislators, media regarding the animal rights industry.<br /><br />We will continue to monitor and follow legislation on behalf of responsible sportsmen and women, dog and animal owners, breeders, and others to the best of our ability but heartily encourage individuals to take the first step in becoming involved in the process. There is a lot at stake here, and this is just the beginning.<br /><br /> Coming Next? Laws limiting the number of dogs a Maine citizen may legally own. These local and national groups have been working with their Maine constituents, members and others to support reasonable legislation and oppose restrictive legislation. For some it is all about the love of the animals. For others, it is about the love of the animals PLUS the rights of the animal owners. Responsible animal owners and responsible sportsmen and women must stick together !Hunting Dog Owners of Mainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06958889573908197869noreply@blogger.com